Select a sequence of posters to use during the teacher-led discussion that will help move all students from their current thinking (often Levels 1–3 below) up to 4 or 5.
Level 1:
Students found examples of specs that make no triangles and one triangle. But the explanations (the why and how) are specific to the numbers and do not address the reasons. (“Our sides were 5, 3, and 1. With those lengths, we couldn’t make a triangle.”)
Level 2:
Like Level 1, but the group uses the numbers to create correct reasons. (“Our sides were 5, 3, and 1. Since 3 + 1 = only 4, the two short sides are not long enough to make a triangle with 5 on the other side.”)
Level 3:
Students move beyond the specific numbers in their explanations (“Our sides were 5, 3, and 1, but to make a triangle the long side has to be less than the sum of the other two”) but do not group triangles together with others in the same category (e.g., one with sides 7-4-2).
Level 4:
Students create coherent reasons and descriptions that go beyond the specific numbers and recognize that other triangles are in the same categories. (“Any time you have side AB with angle A and angle B [and A + B is less than 180°], just draw side AB first, then make the two angles. Where the angle-lines meet is point C. Connect them up to make your triangle.”) Students may explain situations with two or more triangles.
Level 5:
Students recognize that it’s not the specific points and labels that matter, but rather the relationship between them. (“Any time you have a side and the two angles on either end of it, draw the side first—that give you two points—and then the angles. The angle-lines meet at the third point…”) Students can explain the cases where you get two and many triangles coherently.
Supporting Generalization
Help early presenters generalize. For impossible triangles, ask, “!s there a way I could change one of these numbers and have the specs make a triangle?” From there, help the class figure out the criteria for impossibility.
For a unique triangle, ask the class, “Are these specifications the same sort as the others we’ve seen, or are they different? Could they use the same procedure to draw the triangle as these other triangles?” That way, the class can see that making a triangle by specifying 3 sides is different from 2 sides and the included angle, etc.
Connecting across groups
As students present, keep a list of the types of impossible specifications and the ways you can make a unique triangle. You will need to update them as students generalize better; avoid imposing your own wisdom.
How can three clues fail to make a triangle?
- Triangle inequality: with three sides, the longest is longer that the sum of the other two.
- Angles too large: the sum of two angles exceeds 180°.
- Swing-and-a-miss: suppose you have AB = 3 cm, BC = 4 cm, and angle C is 90°. If you make BC first, then angle C, it’s clear that AB can’t “reach” to the other side.
- And how can three clues make a triangle (provided that they don’t meet one of the impossibility criteria above)?
- Three sides (SSS). This can be difficult without a compass; use guess and check to get close.
- Two sides and the angle between (SAS). Always works. Order doesn’t matter.
- Two sides and a different angle. Depends on the details; you could get zero, one, or two. Start with the side connected to the angle.
- Two angles and the included side (ASA). Works if the angles aren’t too big. Draw the side first.
- Two angles and a different side (AAS). Hard unless you know about 180°; guess and check.
Three angles: the miracle of 180°
Students may not know the 180° rule; this is a good time to expose them to it—especially if they discover it themselves. One consequence: If your clues are three angles that add to 180°, you get an infinite number of triangles. All the triangles will be the same shape, but of any size. They’re “similar” instead of “congruent.”
Some students may object to calling the similar triangles different. There are at least two responses: one is to explain that it’s a convention. Another, perhaps more to the point, is that if you were building something (a table top, say) and you made it a different size, it wouldn’t matter that it was the right shape—it would not fit.
How you get two possibilities
One way is on Handout #4, problem #5.