The general culture of the math classroom in the United States is that errors are this taboo thing that are meant to be gotten rid of as soon as they're made. We're changing that and making the error the focal point of the instruction. We're giving the students a chance to engage with errors without the stigma of it having been their own error. The goal is for students to realize that errors can be a productive part of the learning process, and that by making errors in the classroom, it doesn't mean a student is “not a math person,” but that making mistakes is all part of the process and leads us to become better math learners.
Dr. Julie Booth, Temple University
In half of the exercises, students receive an incorrect problem solution and are asked to explain why it is incorrect. This type of activity is believed to improve learning because it helps students to reject their own similar, incorrect procedures. The idea that errors can be effective learning tools is not new: Studies show that asking students to explain both incorrect and correct solutions leads to greater learning. Worked examples can also help motivate students, especially those who are less proficient in math.
Development of GeometryByExample was led by Julie Booth (Temple University) through a SERP collaboration with teacher collaborators in schools in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Tennessee, California, and New Jersey. The collaboration has been supported to conduct this work by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A190126 to Temple University. The information provided does not represent views of the funders.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .
SERP Institute
1100 Connecticut Ave NW
Suite 1310
Washington, DC 20036
SERP Studio
2744 East 11th Street
Oakland, CA 94601
(202) 223-8555
Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 30-0231116