Math teachers whose students benefited from AlgebraByExample urged SERP to develop a collection of geometry assignments using the same powerful, research-based approach.
The assignments can be used in any order and manner and are easily integrated into routine practice with any curriculum, either to supplement or to replace other practice assignments. Regardless of district or state standards, teachers can easily select the assignments that fit their own practice.
Prior research suggests that explaining correct and incorrect worked examples is an effective instructional technique for helping students learn mathematics (e.g, Sweller, 1999; Renkl et al. 1998; Adams et al, 2014). The SERP-Temple team applied the approach in Algebra with AlgebraByExample and then with Grades 4 and 5 with MathByExample, and results from randomized studies demonstrated improvements in student learning for both programs. Preliminary analyses are showing statistically significant results for students using the GeometryByExample materials, as well.
Correct and incorrect examples paired with prompts for students to explain their thinking provide launch points for mathematically rich discussion. It also provides a shared language for modeling, analyzing, critiquing and articulating mathematical arguments. Students’ answers and discussions provide teachers insights to students’ thinking.
The assignments are freely downloadable and can be used for noncommercial purposes. Pre-printed workbooks are also available to order for your convenience. No professional development is required.
Students tend to make some of the same math mistakes over and over again. These repeated errors result from students' underlying misconceptions. With GeometryByExample, students study correct and incorrect examples of geometry problems and answer questions that specifically target common errors and misconceptions. These assignments do much more than just give students practice – they encourage students to think critically about the geometry concepts and procedures and to confront common misconceptions.
Within each GeometryByExample assignment, students:
"I think the students really learned from the error analysis. I enjoyed seeing the types of errors that were included. On a review day before the coordinate geometry test, I used 2 of the activities as part of the test review and I thought that was a great way to use them."
“I think the problems /assignments are great. I find it very valuable to have students analyze other student work (correct and incorrect). I think it really builds greater understanding of content and helps students get better at explaining their thinking and understanding.”
“The way that I used them, as a warm-up, really helped students to get focused and on task for the class period.”
In the spring and summer of 2006, SERP launched its first multi-district field site in collaboration with MSAN and its member districts. During the initial partnership meetings, superintendents set parameters to guide the work. On the basis of decades of experience, they put off limits:
District math coordinators emphasized that asking teachers to substantially change the way they teach was not going to work. One argued that teachers needed a “back door” approach in order to see the benefit of a new practice without having their primary routines uphended.
Among the team of mathematics researchers recruited by SERP for the partnership work, Ken Koedinger (Carnegie Mellon University) saw a potential solution. Decades of laboratory research demonstrate that worked examples interleaved with problems to solve are an effective way to improve student learning compared to assignments that include only problems to solve. Over a six-year period, the SERP-MSAN partners worked to design, test, and redesign assignments that interleaved worked examples that targeted common misconceptions. After many waves of experimentation using rigorous research designs, AlgebraByExample emerged as a finished product with 42 assignments.
MSAN Partner School Districts: AlgebraByExample
Watch what MSAN Teachers Said About AlgebraByExample
Analysis of SERP's AlgebraByExample materials revealed that many misconceptions have their roots in earlier grades. Addressing elementary math misconceptions before middle school is doubly important because early student failure can decrease motivation, hindering students’ future success even further. Traditional practice activities do not address common misconceptions about the problems to solve, allowing misconceptions to linger long after elementary school. Addressing this early is even more important as standards for rigor rise. Better-prepared students will free teachers in higher-level math courses to focus on grade-level content, making it more likely that students will succeed in higher-level math. From 2015-2019, the SERP-Temple team received funding to develop and test MathByExample. In 2019, the MathByExample materials emerged as a finished product with 139 assignments aligned to 4th and 4th grade math standards.
Watch Video about MathByExample
During the original partnership work to create AlgebraByExample, many partner algebra teachers also taught one or more classes of geometry. As they piloted the AlgebraByExample assignments in their algebra classrooms and saw first hand the insight that the worked-example approach provided on student thinking, they started asking about what similar assignments for geometry would look like. Once AlgebraByExample was released, the requests for Geometry assignments multiplied. But adapting the approach to Geometry content presented a new challenge, as much more of geometry is visual, spatial, and conceptual, rather than the general procedural nature of algebra or fractions learning.
AlgebraByExample is a set of Algebra 1 assignments that incorporate worked examples and prompt students to analyze and explain.
Development of GeometryByExample was led by Julie Booth (Temple University) through a SERP collaboration with teacher collaborators in schools in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Tennessee, California, and New Jersey. The collaboration has been supported to conduct this work by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A190126 to Temple University. The information provided does not represent views of the funders.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License .
SERP Institute
1100 Connecticut Ave NW
Suite 1310
Washington, DC 20036
SERP Studio
2744 East 11th Street
Oakland, CA 94601
(202) 223-8555
Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 30-0231116